Mr. Felix,

I’m listening to your Veritas interview and something occurred to me about Carolina Bays. I looked up images of those Bays and I realized that I’ve seen those before, albeit on a different scale.

Carolina Bays on a semi conductor - Photo courtesy of Chris Reynolds

I’m an electronics engineer and those structures look exactly like ESD, electrostatic discharge, on the surface of semiconductor chips. When one doesn’t ground properly, then handles a chip, a slew of small holes are produced by ESD. Some are round and some are oval, same as the Bays. The offender does not feel the discharge. They are numerous and are caused by what you might call nano-lightning from the offender to the chip.

I’ve attached an image of a single ESD from 3M. Imagine a lot of those on a chip and you have Carolina Bays on a semiconductor. The dimples are normal, a byproduct of production.

If the magnetic field has an excursion or reversal, as you suggest, then isn’t it possible that massive electrostatic discharges hit the ground? Think lightning storm, but orders of magnitude more powerful. Depending on the composition of the substrate, some areas produce glass, some vaporize, some explode, etc. Would that not correlate with the vast increase in carbon and other airborne compounds you cite? ESD on those scales should also produce novel compounds, mostly radioactive isotopes as electrons are ripped from – and bound to – nearby elements. Think giant open-air particle collider.

I could be completely wrong, or not. I leave it up to you to decide. I do have knowledge of electromagnetic systems.

Have you posited what will happen to modern technology should our magnetic field reverse? Digital systems frequently rely on electron spin prediction and polarity related to magnetic north. These systems will fail, or become unreliable at best. This includes computers and SCADA systems that control civil engineering projects like water and power systems. Every system we rely on would be crippled or destroyed. I doubt we would notice if massive ESDs start occurring.

I wish you all the best, and please keep up the great work you are doing.

Chris Reynolds

It’s an Electric Universe

I think you could be onto something, Chris!

If you haven’t already, you must read “The Electric Sky,” by Donald E Scott. I think you’ll find that you’re both on the same page.

Dr Scott, who taught electrical engineering at the University of Massachusetts / Amherst for 39 years, thinks that our Sun, and all stars, receive their power from outside, not inside. He further thinks that the solar wind is an electric current connecting the Sun with its family of planets and with its galactic clan.

Also, you’ll want to read “Thunderbolts of the Gods” by David Talbott and Wallace Thornhill, who think that many ancient myths can be explained when we realize that we live in electric universe.

You’ll also want to visit their website, www.thunderbolts.info.

S y n o p s i s
By Mel Fabregas

Robert Felix makes a legitimate case for extinctions due to magnetic reversals. Why hasn’t the scientific community performed a more comprehensive and complete investigation? Given the biases of that system towards orthodox ideas, one wonders if such will ever occur. Perhaps only the inevitable geomagnetic reversal will ultimately resolve the mystery.

Schools have replaced science with non-science and this book brings back a lot of science. Felix answers a lot of questions. He answers Darwin’s missing link problem. He has good evidence to back up his theories. He explains how cataclysmic pole shifts are part of a cycle and how the deposits of coal and diamonds laying on top of dinosaurs’ bones came about. About how oil and diamonds raining from the sky that formed the layers on the Dino bones. Also, he tells about “natural” nuclear explosions can happen. He shows the geo evidence of their occurrence.

From past evidence, it appears that we are due another pole shift. The energies released cause a horrendous lighting storm all over the earth that amalgamates carbon gases in the atmosphere into oil, diamonds and radioactive isotopes. The radiation will mutate and kill the present lifeforms and new species will emerge… This is why there are no evolutionary links Darwin predicted…

There isn’t much written about what happened over 10,000 years ago since we couldn’t write; so observation, analysis and insight are key to understanding the past. This book is about cycles. Felix tells us we are approaching the end of an 11,500 year warming period and about to enter a similar cooling period. He points out that atmospheric carbon produced by humans is not a significant problem. You also will understand what happened to the dinosaurs and the mammoths.

Robert Felix was right about magnetic reversals causing explosions In the atmosphere. He was right about almost everything else as well, according to the hard science of the past thirty years. Felix figured it out. This has been a reliable constant of science for the past 1000 years – all the major advances have been made by laymen working outside their original professions.

One of the problems with Darwin’s theories is exactly that we don’t find the missing links. We find different species appearing seemingly out of nowhere. There are probably other reasons that occur, natural selection being a reason, but the mutations have to occur someway, and gradual mutations probably wouldn’t lead to drastic changes in species that we end up seeing.

Felix also goes into a lot of detail linking extinctions and reversals, as well as creation of new materials on earth. His theories are fascinating. The Himalayan glaciers are growing despite “global warming.” Perhaps Felix’s theories will become proven fact sooner than we think.

This is Segment 1 of 2. Segment 1 is being provided as a courtesy of Veritas Radio. To watch/listen to Segment 2 of this exclusive interview, subscribe at http://www.veritasradio.com and proceed to http://www.veritasradio.com/tv to watch the rest.

Veritas is censorship and commercial-free.

~Mel Fabregas

If for some reason the above sound doesn’t work, you can also access the interview here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_JcVktqMjqY

The new law encourages teachers to present the “scientific strengths and scientific weaknesses” of topics that arouse “debate and disputation” such as “biological evolution, the chemical origins of life, global warming, and human cloning,” and says the goal of science education is to help students “develop critical thinking skills.”

I say three cheers for the Tennessee legislature.

Opponents have derided the new law as a “Monkey Bill,” trying to associate it with the Butler Act and the Scopes Trial of 1925, which earned Tennessee a reputation – deserved or not – as a bastion for backwardness and scientific illiteracy.

“Telling students that evolution and climate change are scientifically controversial is miseducating them,” warned Eugenie C. Scott, executive director of the National Center for Science Education (NCSE).

“(This law) would gut science education in public schools,” warned Hedy Weinberg, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Tennessee.

“What it does is bring the political controversy into the classroom, where there is no scientific controversy,” groused Larisa DeSantis, who teaches in the Department of Earth and Environment at Vanderbilt University. “As a science teacher I would say there is no controversy over evolution or climate change in the scientific literature.”

No controversy over evolution or climate change??? Is the woman blind?

The bill received strong bipartisan support, passing the state House and Senate by a three-to-one margin. Tennessee Governor Bill Haslam allowed the bill to become law without his signature on April 10, 2012, according to the Memphis Commercial Appeal (April 10, 2012).

Opponents argue that the new law is an attempt to introduce religious beliefs such as creationism or “intelligent design” as science, thereby undermining broadly accepted scientific principles and hurting students’ education.

I’m not into intelligent design, as you already know if you’ve read “Magnetic Reversals and Evolutionary Leaps.”  So I’m chagrined that climate change has been lumped together with creationism as just another “religious belief.”

But during a week when 49 NASA  astronauts and scientists filed a written complaint about the agency’s global warming activism, to say that there is “no controversy” over climate change is – if not a flat-out lie – at least a complete misrepresentation of the facts.

See:
http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/04/05/11040270-activists-cry-foul-as-tenn-science-education-bill-hits-governors-desk?lite

Also see:
http://www.insidevandy.com/opinion/article_558b6af4-81d3-11e1-b303-001a4bcf6878.html

Also see:
http://ncse.com/news/2012/04/monkey-bill-enacted-tennessee-007299

Also see:
http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2012/apr/05/hedy-weinberg-gov-bill-haslam-should-veto-monkey/

Also see:
http://doubtfulnews.com/2012/04/tennessee-set-to-roll-back-quality-of-science-education/

Also see:
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5j9qtrNR9N58BMF9bdr9PhzvDkPMQ?docId=29b3e 7661c5943e19b1ea2a227428e57

Also see:
http://www.nashvillescene.com/pitw/archives/2012/04/06/vanderbilt-professor-and-3200-tenne sseans-urge-haslam-to-veto-science-education-bill

Thanks to Kevin Uscinski for these links

“I really enjoy checking your website for climate news,” says Kevin. “I think its great!”

“I was listening to NPR last night and they had a conversation about a new law that was just passed in Tennessee that allowed for criticism of evolution and global warming in the high schools. Apparently some teachers felt like the couldn’t say that these two items were not 100% proven, and this law helps protect them. Anyway the people who opposed this bill kept arguing on the radio show that there is absolutely no controversy on whether or not global warming is occurring, and that there is no evidence to suggest otherwise, so why create the law?

I included some links for you to read about the story. One of the last ones includes petition against the law which describes how they know that global warming is 100% real and a man made problem.

“Vladimir Putin has confirmed Russia has been testing mind-bending psychotronic guns that can effectively turn people into zombies,” says this article in the Herald Sun.

The weapons, which attack their victims’ central nervous system, “could be used against Russia’s enemies and even of its own dissidents by the end of the decade.”

“Mr Putin describes the guns, which use electromagnetic radiation like that found in microwave ovens, as entirely new instruments for achieving political and strategic goals.” (Such as crowd control.)

When the guns were used for dispersing a crowd and focused on a man, “his body temperature went up immediately as if he was thrown into a hot frying pan,” Mr Tsyganok said.

Previous research has shown that low-frequency waves or beams can affect brain cells, alter psychological states and make it possible to transmit suggestions and commands directly into someone’s thoughts.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/technology/sci-tech/russia-working-on-electromagnetic-radiation-guns/story-fn5iztw3-1226317396841
Thanks to Joe Herr for this link

We’ll talk about the coming ice age, ice-age cycles, the devastating winter in central Europe and Alaska, glaciers growing in the United States, glaciers growing in the Himalayas, magnetic reversals (scientists now say the next reversal is “imminent”), volcanoes, evolutionary leaps … and who knows what questions George may come up with?

Please join us on your local radio station, or online:
http://www.coasttocoastam.com/

I’ve been on the radio many times with George, so was very pleased to meet him in person on one of his trips to Seattle.

The Scam of Scum

By Dr. Klaus L.E. Kaiser

Algae, the green stuff suspended in and floating on the surface of over-fertilized (polluted) water, AKA scum, is supposed to save America’s dependence on foreign crude oil. The President has said so. He stated that “up to 17% of the oil we import for transportation” could be replaced with this fuel [1].

The Chemistry

To begin with, a mass of algae is not the same as a container of crude oil. Algae are small plant-like organisms living in water. Like all plants, they use the energy of sunlight to convert carbon dioxide (CO2, i.e., one carbon and two oxygen atoms per molecule) to plant matter. In chemical terms, crude oil is a pure hydrocarbon of the approximate composition CH2 (i.e., one carbon and two hydrogen atoms per molecule). The composition of algae is more like CH2O, sort of half way in between CO2 and CH2. Because of the remaining oxygen atom in the plant matter (CH2O), its energy content is substantially lower than that of a pure hydrocarbon. You might say that it is already half burnt (the end product of which, of course, is CO2).

Fuel from Plants

Technologically, it is quite feasible to convert any plant matter (CH2O) to pure hydrocarbons (CH2). That process requires a reducing agent, such as elemental hydrogen (H2), dry plant matter, heat, and technology. We can make any amount of hydrogen we wish, by electrolysis from abundant water (H2O), but this process consumes a lot of energy. Then you need more energy for the reducing process itself. Overall, in energy terms, the entire process would consume more energy than the product would likely deliver to your car. So, really no energy savings accrues whatsoever.

The Technology

Growing algae in a pond is quite simple. All you need is some fertilizer (phosphate and other mineral salts) and sunlight. Mother Nature does the rest. It may take a few weeks, but then you have a pond of green water, with mostly suspended algae and some floating on the surface. While the pond may look like “green pea soup” to you then, all that green stuff represents a rather small amount of solid material, the actual algal biomass which you need for the next step.

The next step is to separate the algae from the water. That is not as easy as it may sound. Most of the algae are very small particles; so attempting to filter them out will quickly lead to clogged filters, with hardly any water making it through the filter after a short while. Keeping the filtration going will be a major headache. That problem is well known from sewage treatment systems, which are essentially such artificial ponds for bacteria and algae production.

Filtration problems can be avoided if using methods to agglomerate the small particulates to larger ones, which then settle out and accumulate at the bottom as sludge. Still, that sludge contains much water, which is even more difficult to separate from the solids. In any event, the dewatering process requires substantial time and/or energy. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has a 200+ page document on Dewatering Municipal Wastewater Sludges describing the various methods and processes [2].

Fuel from Carbon

If we really would wish to convert a readily available carbon source to hydrocarbons, the well known Fischer-Tropsch synthesis of oil from coal and water would be a much better way. That process was used on a large scale in Germany for many years. The reason is easy to understand. First and foremost, you start out with more or less pure and dry carbon (coal). You don’t need a large pond, fertilizer, time, a filtration or sludge settling and dewatering system, or any exorbitant amount energy to mine it. Second, you don’t need expensive hydrogen to reduce it to CH2. In fact, water (hot steam) will do.

Fuel from Limestone

The same process which turns coal into fuel (Fischer-Tropsch process) can be used to make fuel from limestone. I have described it in more detail before [3, 4]. In fact, it would be much easier and more straightforward to make diesel or gasoline from limestone than from algae.

Conclusion

The current administration’s concept to replace a large part of imported crude oil with “homegrown” stuff from algae is akin to superstition. It bears no semblance to any reasonable cost/benefit analysis in either energy or cost terms.

In simple terms, it’s just another “green” scam.

[1] Kelp is on the way to help with high gas prices

“If the president’s problem with oil stems from concerns about price volatility and alleged environmental impacts, why is he now proposing to replace oil with a potential fuel source that would require millions of acres of land and billions of gallons of water to produce at a wildly expensive price?,” asks this article in the Washington Times.

“(Mr Obama’s) latest speech is a reminder that when it comes to real solutions to higher energy prices, the president is either clueless or callously indifferent.”

[2] EPA-625/1-82/014
[3] www.convenientmyths.com
[4] Wind + Limestone = Gasoline

The process of converting electricity to gasoline is very simple. It requires only limestone and water (and, of course, electricity).

Dr. Klaus L.E. Kaiser
Most recent columns on Canada Free Press

Dr. Klaus L.E. Kaiser is author of CONVENIENT MYTHS, the green revolution – perceptions, politics, and facts
convenientmyths.com

Dr. Kaiser can be reached at: mail@convenientmyths.com

“I’ve never seen anything close to this,” says Aaro Kukkohovi, who photographed an eruption of light over Lumijoki, Finland:

“What a fantastic burst of energy–like something blew a hole into Earth’s magnetic field just above us!”

Hi Robert,

Spotted this fascinating piece on http://www.spaceweather.com/ today:

Kukkohovi’s rhetorical flourish isn’t far wrong. The cause of the display was the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) tipping south and opening a ‘crack‘ in Earth’s magnetosphere. Solar wind poured in and fuelled a G1-class geomagnetic storm. This was a high latitude event; the lights were brightest over Scandinavia, Iceland and Greenland.

Best regards,

Hans Schreuder
Analytical chemist

Note: Although I’d like to think this article is based in fact,  I (Robert) do not see where Viktor Seleznyov mentions anything about a shifting of the poles. If you find an article where he does in fact mention magnetic reversals, I’d love to post it. (Or even evidence that Seleznyov is who this article purports him to be.)

In short, I think this article is totally bogus … but it’s still interesting to contemplate.

Director Seleznyov, and other SB RAS scientists, have been increasingly concerned over the past fortnight about this region after the 9 February and 12 February “mysterious blasts” in the Kemerovo Region reminiscent of the 30 June 1908 Tunguska Event that remains the largest explosion of its type in modern times that for over a century has yet to be fully explained.

Another note. I devote two chapters to Tunguska in Magnetic Reversals and Evolutionary Leaps. One chapter is entitled “Tunguska,” the other is entitled “Hundreds of Thousands of Tunguskas.”

I’d like to think that the “director of the Geophysical Institute at the Siberian branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences” said these words about the Siberian explosions, because I expect more and more Tunguska-like explosions as we come closer and closer to the magnetic reversal.

As I say in Magnetic Reversals and Evolutionary Leaps, “Our world—our expanding globe—was not created during some unknow­able, unexplainable “Big Bang”; it was, and still is, being created by accretion, one tiny speck at a time, by millions of “Little Bangs,” all triggered by geomagnetic reversals.” (p. 132)

The “common linkage” between these mysterious explosions and increasing seismic events in Siberia, this report says, is due to the rapid shifting of our Earth’s magnetic North Pole that has doubled in the last 50 years, and in the 1990s “picked up speed in a big way,” bolting north–northwest into the Arctic Ocean at more than 55 kilometers per year.

To the most immediate effect upon our Earth due to this “magnetic pole anomaly,” this report continues, has been the “strange disruption” of the jet stream over the Northern Hemisphere that on the North American side has produced the driest and warmest winter weather in recorded history, but on the European side has caused record-setting cold and snow that has claimed over 650 lives.

Though Director Seleznyov notes in this report that the evidence for a “full scale” geomagnetic reversal of the positions of magnetic north and magnetic south are still being debated, our Earth is, “without a doubt,” currently undergoing a Laschamp-type geomagnetic “event” known as a geomagnetic excursion.

A geomagnetic excursion, like a geomagnetic reversal, is a significant change in the Earth’s magnetic field. Unlike reversals however, an excursion does not permanently change the large-scale orientation of the field, but rather represents a dramatic, typically short-lived decrease in field intensity, with a variation in pole orientation of up to 45 degrees from the previous position.

The Laschamp Geomagnetic “Event” noted in this report is interesting on a number of levels due to its having occurred between 7,000-17,000 years ago falling within the working timeframe of: 1.) The flash freezing of Siberia where still today woolly mammoths are still uncovered in near pristine condition, and 2.) The 11 August 3114 BCE start date of the Mayan Calendar that seemingly predicts the year of 2012 will, indeed, experience another such cataclysmic event.

Important to note is that in our 7 January 2011 report “Pole Shift Blamed For Russian Air Disaster, Closure Of US Airport” we had stated the growing concerns of Russian, EU and US officials due to the rapid shifting of our Earth’s magnetic poles that had led the Kremlin to order an additional 5,000 survival shelters built in Moscow alone, and the Europeans to construct what is called the “Doomsday Seed Vault.”

Most curious to note in all of these events, especially after 2011 experienced a record cost of $265 billion in natural disasters (a record set just the previous year, 2010, that cost $218 billion), are that the Western nations, most notably the United States, continues to coax their populations into complacency regarding the unprecedented events now occurring, and showing every likelihood to get worse.

To how abhorrent US officials are to their citizens preparing for natural disasters, or other type emergencies, their propaganda media organs this past month launched a series of news reports, magazine articles and television programmes depicting these people as “Doomsday Preppers” who are mentally ill, at best, or deranged, at worst.

This depiction by the US of people who prepare for the worst of times as “crackpots” stands in sharp contrast to the entirety of human civilization where it was a valued practice to store up food and supplies in preparation for any eventuality. And to the “eventuality” one should, indeed, prepare for, as noted in Director Seleznyov’s report, is the growing global chaos that could very well ensue should his predictions prove accurate.

To the validity of Director Seleznyov’s predictions, should they come horrifyingly true this year, one need look no further than the letter conversations held between arguable two of the greatest minds of the 20^th century; Albert Einstein (1879-1955) the German-born theoretical physicist who developed the theory of general relativity, and Immanuel Velikovsky (1895-1975) the Russian-born American independent scholar of Jewish origins.

Where on one hand Einstein represented the modern scientific community regarding the possibility of “sudden” Earth changes, Velikovsky gave voice to the all of the ancient peoples who ever lived on this Earth who stated they witnessed these “sudden” Earth changes first hand, with the “battle” between them resting on what was going to be the “final outcome” and, perhaps, best articulated by Einstein in his 22 May 1954 letter to Velikovsky that, in part, said:

“The proof of “sudden” changes is quite convincing and meritorious. If you had done nothing else but to gather and present in a clear way this mass of evidence, you would have already a considerable merit.”

Though Einstein died before he and Velikovsky were able to complete their “debate,” critical assumptions made by Einstein in backing his position were subsequently proved to be false, and as Velikovsky completely documented in his manuscript “Before The Day Breaks”.

To us living today, and as detailed in Director Seleznyov’s report, of whom to believe…Einstein or Velikovsky…will determine the fate billions…and if the ancients are to be believed, the “end” will come much, much sooner than later.

February 26, 2012 © EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked back to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com.

Another note. When I click on the above link, my anti-virus software gives the following message: “VIPRE has determined that the site you are trying to visit contains potentially harmful or objectionable content.”

Source of article:
Again, although I’d like to think it is based on fact, I really think it is bogus.
http://www.thetotalcollapse.com/mysterious-siberian-blasts-warned-point-to-rapid-pole-reversal/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheTotalCollapse+%28The+Total+Collapse%29

Thanks to Scott Shock, Harvey and Laurel for this link

“Carbon Rain.” That’s the title of chapter 12 in Magnetic Reversals and Evolutionary Leaps, wherein I propose that carbon rains from the sky at extinctions. That’s why we find dinosaurs buried in coal.

And that’s why we find oil on Saturn’s moon Titan.

Close up toward south polar region of Saturn's largest moon, Titan, showing a depression within the moon's orange and blue haze layers near the south pole. NASA’s Cassini spacecraft snapped the image on 11 Sep 2011.

Now comes this controversial study published in the journal Nature on 27 Oct 2011.

“An analysis of the spectral emissions from distant stars suggests that compounds of unexpected complexity – some resembling coal and petroleum – exist throughout the universe and are being made by stars,” says writer Kate Melville.

By analyzing the emissions of star dust formed in exploding stars, scientists have found that “stars are making these complex organic compounds in time frames of only weeks.”

Not through some long, drawn-out process taking thousands of years, mind you, but in a mere matter of weeks!

According to Professors Sun Kwok and Yong Zhang of the University of Hong Kong, not only are stars producing this complex organic matter, they are also ejecting it into interstellar space. “Theoretically, this is impossible, but observationally we can see it happening,” said Kwok.

The compound’s chemical structures resemble those of coal and petroleum, says Kwok.

Although coal and oil are thought to arise only from living organisms, the tell-tale spectra show complex organic compounds can be synthesized in space even when no life forms are present, says Kwok.

See entire article:
http://www.scienceagogo.com/news/20110926200551data_trunc_sys.shtml

Thanks to Ronald Baker for this link

“This reminded me of your book,” says Ronald.

See also “Lakes of oil on Saturn’s Moon Titan”
http://iceagenow.info/2011/10/lakes-oil-saturns-moon-titan/

And “Raining Methane on Titan”
http://iceagenow.info/2012/01/raining-methane-titan/

The footage, claimed to have been caught by a government-employed engineer last summer in the Chukotka Autonomous Okrug region of Siberia, has lead a paranormal investigator to suggest that the woolly mammoth is not extinct after all.

Some viewers dismiss the video as a hoax, some think it’s an elephant lost in the Siberian wilderness, yet others think it’s a bear eating a huge fish.

I’ll go with number three. I think it’s a bear carrying a just-caught salmon to the river bank.

See entire article:
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/4116326/Woolly-mammoth-spotted-in-Siberia.html

Thanks to Del A. Hilber for this link